Teachers’ Perspective: Revolutionizing English Classroom Interaction with Technology Integration
Keywords:
technology-based learning, online feedback, English classroomAbstract
The integration of technology into language teaching has emerged as a prominent alternative for facilitating the classroom interaction. Thus, this study aims to present the teachers’ perspective on the use of technology in the learning activity, especially in English classroom integrated with the online feedback. The data were collected from the interview and observation involving teachers inside and outside the classroom. The sample for this study consisted of teachers from Senior High School in Surakarta, Central Java Province. The results of the study indicated that the use of technology integrated with the online feedback promoted meaningful teaching and learning activity. The integration of technology-based learning and online feedback in English classroom was effective, but it should also be added with the offline one, especially in giving the feedback to the students. In addition, this study found that teachers are confronted with a problem of the connection or networking using the technology. The results suggest for the effective use of technology in the learning activity.
References
Akkuzu, N. (2014). The Role of Different Types of Feedback in the Reciprocal Interaction of Teaching Performance and Self-efficacy Belief. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 39(3). https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2014v39n3.3
Bagul M.M. (2020). Education by The Application of Technology in Digital Era. In Developing the Next Generation Learners in This Digital Era: Vol. II. Lulu Publication.
Bigatel, P., Ragan, L., Kennan, S., May, J., & Redmond, B. (2012). The Identification of Competencies for Online Teaching Success. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Network, 16, 59–78. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v16i1.215
Chandler, J. (2003). The efficacy of various kinds of error feedback for improvement in the accuracy and fluency of L2 student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12(3), 267–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(03)00038-9
D, M. B., Ampa, A. T., Andriani, A. A., & Asmasary, A. A. (2022). Integration of Technology in English Classroom Interaction. Technium: Romanian Journal of Applied Sciences and Technology, 4(10), Article 10. https://doi.org/10.47577/technium.v4i10.7994
Ellis, R. (2009). A typology of written corrective feedback types. ELT Journal, 63(2), 97–107. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccn023
Hashim, H. (2018). Application of Technology in the Digital Era Education. International Journal of Research in Counseling and Education, 1(2), 1. https://doi.org/10.24036/002za0002
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The Power of Feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487
Hyland, K., & Hyland, F. (2006). Feedback in Second Language Writing: Contexts and Issues. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524742
Jie, Z., & Sunze, Y. (2021). Investigating pedagogical challenges of mobile technology to English teaching. Interactive Learning Environments, 0(0), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1903933
Leibold, N., & Schwarz, L. M. (2015). The Art of Giving Online Feedback. The Journal of Effective Teaching, 15(1), 34–46.
Matsumura, S., & Hann, G. (2004). Computer Anxiety and Students’ Preferred Feedback Methods in EFL Writing. The Modern Language Journal, 88, 403–415. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0026-7902.2004.00237.x
McCord, M. (2012). Exploring Effective Feedback Techniques in the ESL Classroom. Language Arts Journal of Michigan, 27(2). https://doi.org/10.9707/2168-149X.1905
Nugroho, A., Haghegh, M., & Triana, Y. (2021). Emergency Remote Teaching amidst Global Pandemic: Voices of Indonesian EFL Teachers. VELES Voices of English Language Education Society, 5(1), 66–80. https://doi.org/10.29408/veles.v5i1.3258
Richards, J. C., & Renandya, W. A. (Eds.). (2002). Methodology in Language Teaching: An Anthology of Current Practice. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511667190
Ritonga, M., Shaban, A. A., Al-Rashidi, A. H., & Chilani, N. (2023). Engagement in On-line Language Assessment: Are test-taking skills, self-assessment, resilience, and autonomy critical? Language Testing in Asia, 13(1), 25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-023-00236-2
Shafie, H., Majid, F. A., & Ismail, I. S. (2019). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) in Teaching 21st Century Skills in the 21st Century Classroom. Asian Journal of University Education, 15(3), 24–33.
Storch, N., & Wigglesworth, G. (2010). Learners’ Processing, Uptake, And Retention of Corrective Feedback On Writing: Case Studies. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32(2), 303–334. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263109990532
Tammy Worcester. (2009). Hello? Cell Phones as Teaching Tools? NECC conference, Washington DC. http://istevision.org/watch.php?vid=48eefefb69e50677fda3c12b3514b37e8d6daa24
Triana, Y., & Nugroho, A. (2021). Brief ELT in Digital Classroom for Lazy Creative Lecturers ( Option After Post Pandemic Recovery ): Lecturers ’ Perspectives. IJEFL (Indonesian Journal of EFL and Linguistics), 6(1), 79–99. https://doi.org/10.21462/ijefl.v6i1.343
Ur, P. (1996). A Course in Languange Teaching. Cambridge University Press.
Retnaningsih, W., Nugroho, A., Triana, Y., Putra, H. R., & Mutiaraningrum, I. (2023). Impact of WhatsApp-Integrated Flipped Learning on Developing English Speech Acts of Requests: Students’ Performance, Perception, and Acceptance. Educational Administration: Theory and Practice, 29(203–221). https://doi.org/10.17762/kuey.v29i2.715
Zaman, Md. M., & Azad, Md. A. K. (2012). Feedback in EFL Writing at Tertiary Level: Teachers’ and Learners’ Perceptions. ASA University Review, 6, 1.
Zulaiha, D., & Triana, Y. (2023). Students’ Perception toward the Use of Open Educational Resources to Improve Writing Skill. Studies in English Language and Education, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v10i1.25797
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Faricha Rizqi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
